Posts Tagged ‘Racism’

Racism in the Ukraine

It seems that there’s alot of press these days about racism in football.  Apparently some fans call things by their proper name and mock the negros who play for their teams.  They did the same thing in the US long ago – turning our white hometown teams into diverse melting pots.  After enough time passes, your sports teams become dictated by money with most players not even living in the areas they are supposed to represent.  Certainly negros do not belong in Europe and do not represent your values.

Fans supposedly are throwing bananas at blacks or chanting “monkey.”  These are good things and it is healthy to feel that way.  The mainstream media (MSM) does not share this sentiment and launched a minor propaganda campaign to assure the negros that they are safe and yes, that they are loved throughout the world.–sow.html

I don’t know how many Ukrainian readers we have here, but I’d like to assure them that these initiatives do not represent racially aware white Americans.  It seems as if there is this push against Russia and Eastern Europe because they are behind us in feminism, gay rights, and multiculturalism.  There is even whispers of enacting “hate speech” laws that have censored white racial awareness in the UK, Australia, and the US.

These things are not done in my name, and I will not support any efforts to go to war in any form with Russia, Ukraine, Poland, the Baltics, or any other white nation.  In fact, I believe that Eastern Europe represents the best hope for the white race in the long term.  Stay white!




Bipolar World

November 17, 2011 8 comments

Former neocon thinktanker John Hulsman is one of the only realistic voices on the right wing. He is not a Jew and broke with the Jeocons over their disastrous escapades in the middle east. He is second only in honesty and courage to Michael Scheuer among system entrenched conservatives. This could at once be taken as mild admiration and damnation by faint praise.

Why do I bring up this insignificant policy man? He gives me a good jumping off point. There are not many people on the left or right who can be taken seriously. The left would advocate that nuclear arms sharing is good for us. It is after all “unfair” for us to have nuclear weapons while every other banana republic around the world is denied their right to the same. My god! Could any line of argumentation be more insane? Then the right, firmly in the hands of the Jew, simply have no credibility. They know nothing but lies. Who can listen to a word they say? The paleos are so trapped in American nostalgia that you can’t have a serious conversation with them. They seem to think that all of our problems will magically go away with enough prayer, and agrarian constitutionalism.

Hulsman has a moderate brain on his shoulders. However I don’t like the message. He claims that America must become used to a multipolar world. This new world is one where America can no longer call the shots irrespective of the views of the rest of the world. In this world we need to be an equal player with several large power brokers in the world.

I don’t think the world works that way. I think that the weak share. The strong rule. When we become too weak to rule, it is then that we will begin sharing. That will happen any way. His points are valid. We will of course not be able to control all of the resources of the world. White racist Americans never wanted to in the first place. It is the Jews who have driven our expansionist foreign policy.

We never wanted to fight Germany. The Jews tricked us into those wars. The Jews also tricked us into these incursions into the middle east. I have no problem with our escapades in central America. Not all meddling is bad. If it is to bring resources into our country I think that it’s justified.

I’m no neocon. I don’t believe that we can or should rule the world. However, I don’t think that we should settle for backing down to let other super powers emerge. Let’s face it, greed and empire are not uniquely American. If we back down, others will be in the drivers seat. I’m thinking of China in particular, but Russia and Europe may want parity at first, but over time, may just want to be the next America. That seems to be human nature.

I don’t want either. I don’t want to be replaced, nor do I want to rule single handedly. I think that we need an entirely new paradygm. We need a White bloc! Russia, the EU and the US should form one Aryan World Council. We should rule equally, bear equal burden, and share out equal reward. It is the White man’s only hope of avoiding destruction by way of fratricidal competition, or being eventually subjugated by China. I know it’s an unrealistic idea under the Jewish democracies under which we now live. We must destroy our respective governments and form our own council. In fact, we should not wait to be in power. We should form such a council now to prepare for the turbulent future ahead.

We are each too large and strong to defeat one another. We must not allow nationalists to pull us into any such disastrous wars, or even stand offs. Let us all thank the stars that we survived the cold war.

In fact, it is even possible to join the entire Aryan world geographically into one enormous, contiguous super state beginning Europe, extending up through Russia all the way to Alaska, down through Canada and including the USA.  One giant empire of White men never again to be set against one another but united to dominate the world and preserve our race.

Of course Australia and New Zealand would also be part of such a super-state.

If you are in contact with White leaders anywhere in the World, pass them this message so that they might consider this proposal.

Forget the Pax Americana and forget multipolarism. Let us create a bipolar world; Aryan vs Han. Together we can govern the world. United we will stand. Divided we will fall. We cannot wait for Capitalist Democratic governments to choose our path. These Jews and White race traitors will lead us to ruin. We must find our own way and begin our struggle.

I propose the following three people lead, based on decades of self sacrifice, radical roots, and successes in support of White interests:

1.) Russia – Dmitry Demushkin
2.) Europe – Nick Griffin
3.) America – David Duke

Please make sure that these three men are made aware of this article. Encourage these men to cooperate and communicate.

No More Brothers’ War!

Death to Nationalism!

White Pride World Wide!

The Retreat to Primitivism

October 9, 2011 2 comments

Yesterday, I attended the “Occupy Los Angeles” protest, which is the west coast wing of “Occupy Wall Street” movement. I have a certain sympathy with anyone who recognizes the extreme disparity between rich and poor in our society. In the United States 10% of the population owns 71% of the nation’s wealth and the top 1% owns 38%. I’m all for hard working and intelligent people to earn more than those who don’t work as hard. However, that is not the case in the US. There are many ways in which the rich have extreme advantages over the rest. Also, there is a difference between a greater reward and lordship which is where we are today. We have guys driving around in submarines with helicopter pads while millions are sleeping on the sidewalks.

The rich like to claim that they made all of their money by themselves and owe nothing to society. How much money would they have made without low paid workers? How much without publicly funded roads? How much without buildings? How much without a publicly funded military in which low paid soldiers bring resources to America from throughout the world? How much without a publicly funded police force to protect their assets. How much without publicly educated employees? How much without publicly funded water, electrical, postal system and internet? The wealthy could not be wealthy if it were not for the support network which they receive in our society.

Let’s take the flipside. Let’s say that they do owe nothing to the rest of society. In that case we owe nothing to them. If it’s every man for himself, then we should simply march up to their homes and drag them out. He uses his wealth. I can use my muscle.

Among other things, this disparity of wealth, raising the rich to the status of nobility has caused the average man to question modernity itself. The average man has a very limited understanding of history. He does not know for example that the average life span in 1900 was 65. The average lifespan in 1800 was 55. The average lifespan before that was in the 20’s. Modernity is pretty fucking cool.

The problem today is that the average guy is made to feel like a loser. He sees people who are not a great deal smarter than himself driving expensive cars and living in mansions, while he works like hell just to keep a roof over his head. If he watches television, his psyche is in for a real bruising. Everyone on television, including the commercials, looks like a super model, drives several SUVs has a stable marriage (to a super model) and lives in a mansion. This is the average family in something as mundane as a soap commercial!

The reaction is that people are giving up. There are many revolutionary and alternative movements out there today. Some don’t recognize themselves as revolutionary. Almost all of these groups who believe that they are in opposition to one another are actually on the same side. It is the side of primitivism.

The largest primitivist group is the xian movement. The xians, with a few exceptions have maintained an anti-science stance. From their arson of the Alexandrian Library and murder of it’s librarian Hypatia to their opposition to heliocentrism, to their modern attacks on the teaching of evolution and their opposition to solving the global warming crisis. One xian on this very blog questioned the truth of mathematics! This is by far the largest and most dangerous of primitive reactions to modernity, because it enjoys sympathy among the general population. I believe that in the US this working class, primitivist, reactionary movement only needs difficult economic times and a popular military general to sweep us back to the middle ages.

Obviously communism and anarchism would swamp us with so many non-Whites that any hope for modernity would be lost, no matter what their official positions on science may be.

Neo-Paganism is also a primitivist movement. Although it is an Aryan movement and I do sympathize with their respect for our traditions, their wish to return to a glorious Germanic age which never existed, is not the path of modernity. One can see their glorification of the middle ages, just like the xtians. Aaah, life was simpler then. You died at birth. So did your mom. You didn’t need to study, just run around being glorious with your sword. Bullshit! The Germans used to sell their children as slaves to the Romans just for food.

I know several extremely intelligent followers of Asatru, but most of it is Hollywood movie Viking dress up and a wish to return to an age where they could be mentally lazy. Also, the advocacy of things which are simply untrue does not sit well with me, like guys flying around in the sky with eight legged horses and such. Just like the xians, the wannabe Viking neo-pagans, and superstitious “traditionalists” are primitivist movements guided by liberal arts adherents.

No! It is time to shape up and discipline ourselves. It is time to study hard, not what interests you, but what society demands. That is math and science. The future can be yours, but not by retreating to a fantasy vision of the middle ages. We must restore community spirit and a degree of socialism, but not at the expense of forward progress.

How a Few Can Change the Course of History

September 6, 2011 12 comments

As of today, there is no viable movement for the future of the White race. The White movement today is divided roughly into two equally ineffective camps, the ignorant beer swiller and the selfish and effete egg-head. Either could solve our problems, but both lack the will. The beer swiller is too preoccupied with having a good time and doesn’t want personal risk. The egg head doesn’t even want change, really. He is so comfortable that he doesn’t want to rock the boat too much. He just likes to read interesting journals.

Our goal is not to continue recruiting more of these useless people either with rock concerts or more IQ and race articles. Our goal must be to create an entirely autonomous movement from scratch.

What every movement needs more than anything else is money. The beer swiller has none to give. The egg head will not let any go.

For this reason, we must breed an entirely new kind of activist; a rare kind of activist. Because this new breed will be, by its very demands, a rare breed, we must have a movement which does not demand more than a few members to achieve total victory. Sounds impossible? Not hardly!

I propose that we scrap the existing racial movement all together. A few disciplined and self-sacrificing activists will achieve victory alone. The plan demands that only a few activists dedicate themselves to the cause for approximately 10-20 years.

These activists must dedicate themselves to taking the highest paid jobs in the country. Right now the average Spinal Surgeon in the US earns $600,000 dollars per year; above average can be in the millions. One such earner could finance an entire movement if he was dedicated to the cause instead of himself. In fact, he could fund the creation of entire communities and still live like a king himself.

If such a one were willing to spend ten years studying to gain such employment and then invest several million to set up a community and a school, he could create more such people and within a couple of generations there would be many such people and untold millions of dollars at our disposal. Even if most of them become greedy and selfish as often happens with the moneyed class, there would still be a few who would remain loyal. It would only require a few to fund any projects we need and victory would be ours. We would soon be able to out spend the Jews. Soon thereafter, the mass of White funds would come to us as it would be far more natural for White people to side with us than with the Jews as they do today through fear.

So, White man, there are already people following this plan. Take the personal pledge, no matter your age. Do it yourself. Raise your children toward the same goal. Encourage your friends to do the same. If you agree with this post, please take the time to read my other posts. If you find any that you agree with, please pass them along to others so that these ideas get to the right people, who may not know of this site.

If you are a professional already, and have a conscience, stop hoarding and make sure you’re donating to a group regularly, not a journal or political party, but someone who’s building White homogeneous community right now! We’ve had enough of theoretical ideas. We need concrete results on the ground.

I recommend the following two groups, and only the following two groups, for very specific reasons:

1.) The PLE at Kalispell, Montana because they have actually moved people to the pacific northwest. They need and deserve your financial support.

2.) The Nationalist Coalition You should only donate specifically to their White student scholarship. Make sure that your money goes to fund this specific project. This is the only organisation that is trying to better our race through encouraging education for our youth.

If you are in contact with either of these groups, encourage them to join forces. What needs to happen is an educated community in the pacific northwest. If these two groups worked in cooperation great things could happen.

Eventually we could fund the education of proven, self-sacrificing activists and require in return a certain number of years service upon graduation to pay the movement back for its investment. This is the same policy practised today by labor union apprenticeships.

In this age of repression against our ideas, the high-profile movements are a drain of resources and a liability. Whoring for the cameras, marching, flyer distributions, running for office, and all of the other wasteful publicity stunts, only alert our powerful enemies to our existence and our actions in order that they might suppress us. Also, by recruiting 10 worthless members for every one that will actually contribute work, you flood your group with liability. A criminal among you will cause your group to be shut down, and an informant among you can do the same. None of what I propose requires any publicity whatsoever, just hard work.

Stop allowing your money to be frittered away on vain election campaigns or repetitive journal articles. Do something lasting and productive.

Racial Socialism – A Path for a New Age

September 1, 2011 25 comments

When deciding upon a political ideology, everything must be on the table. In times of crisis, there should be no sacred cows. There is no sacred scroll which states that the racist movement should be aligned with right wing or conservative interests. In fact, I will attempt to point out that this is a mistake on the part of the vast majority of White men.

When we look back at history, we like to fancy ourselves as the nobility of the past. We fancy our noble ancestors riding on their gallant steeds in their shiny and glorious armor. In our reverie we ask “Why cant we return to those glorious days when our honored forefathers rode with sword in hand?”

The problem is that this view of history is absolutely ridiculous. The vast majority of White men were peasants. These people were in some form owned by a few wealthy landowners. If a White man wants to dream about the middle ages, he should fondly remember his smelly toothless ancestors toiling the fields under the watchful eye of armed knights, who, like the clergy of the time, did not earn their status but were born into a strong family. Try to imagine a George W Bush in a monk’s robe or clad in metal.

Of course, it was believed by the wealthy landowners that peasants were of lesser stock. That would be a helpful attitude if you wanted to own them and pass them along to your children. In fact, the lord was considered so far superior to his underlings that in the King James version of the bible they bestow the title upon their god.

So, is it true? Are we all of such low stock? If the nobility were so genetically superior to us, why could they not figure a way to subdue us? Today we see many examples of industrious, disciplined giants whose children just don’t measure up. By contrast, we also see many children of humble parents rise up to become giants of industry. Are we to believe that with competition barred by divine right that the temptation for sloth wouldn’t be all the greater?

Well, jumping ahead a bit, we arrived at the enlightenment. By then the invention of the printing press had made it possible for the poor to become a little bit closer to literacy. The discovery of lots of new land in the Americas allowed for more living space, and thus more options, for the hordes of Europe. Trade was beginning to make humbly born merchants more powerful than the landlords. The anti-royal and anti-papal movements that were by now widespread in England continued with vigor in the Americas, and culminated in the American revolution (not without a fair amount of support in England, it should be noted).

The American revolution was as much a Masonic revolution as the Russian revolution was a Communist one. There were plenty of Masons in England and France cheering it on. So, it was not only a war of independence, but an ideological war that stood against the idea of noble birth. The real story here is that it worked. The sons of peasants were, in fact, superior to the nobility. They defeated the nobility in battle, but that’s not all. The sons of the low born brought a surge in invention. It was not long after the revolutions of America and France that the industrial revolution took place with all of the invention that made it possible. America became a vast empire, as did France under Napoleon.

The Czar of Russia was a last hold out. Eventually change would come. Unfortunate, though it was, that the Jews had so much to gain from dismantling the old order and led the Bolsheviks to power, the change had to and would have come eventually with or without them. It was the inevitable result of industrialization. The Russian folk would not remain lowly submissive peasants forever. The Czar’s absurd family itself shows the fallacy of noble superiority. If that wasn’t enough, the growth of a Soviet empire and the explosion of scientific and mathematical creativity exhibited by the soviets should lay the notion to waste.

Despite the brutality displayed by the Bolsheviks, once the transition was complete, they at least showed that deploying money and resources into the peasantry could create a highly educated and creative race, one that could rival, and at times surpass, those of the traditional west.

If the reader will agree that birth does not make a man superior within the White race, then one must consider the implications of supporting the rich and their interests in the White world today.

I am not opposed to “multiculturalism”, but multiracism. A variety of Aryan cultures is welcome in my opinion. We should keep our terminology straight and accurate, and not use cowardly and misleading euphemisms. These types of confusing terms lead us to supporting White on White ethnic disputes which slaughter White children.

So, getting our terminology straight, and using my own nation’s history, let’s examine who got us into the multi-racial mess in the first place. Was it the left and the working class? I think not. The first massive integration project in America was caused by the wealthy landowners, who did not want to pay Aryan workers. They brought millions of niggers from Africa into our land, knowing full well what the eventual results would mean for our race. Why did they do it? For a profit and nothing else.

Fast forward 100 years or so. Another enormous wave of non-Whites was brought in by rich capitalist railroad owners, over the objections of the White working class and, in particular, the left. The Chinese laborers were brought into our country to lower the wages and safety provisions for the workers. The California Irishman Dennis Kearney began the Workingman’s Party to defend White men from the Chinese. Much of San Francisco is named after this great White man and champion of the workers. The famed California author and devoted Marxist, Jack London wrote stories against the Jews and a genocidal story about exterminating the Chinese using biological warfare.

I cannot find one instance of non-Whites being brought in to the US by the left or by the labor unions. In fact, it was the policy of the AFL to not allow non-Whites membership. The AFL-CIO opposed immigration until very recently. It was Ronald Reagan, modern hero of the Republican Party and millions of conservatives, who signed a sweeping amnesty granting, with the stroke of a pen, millions of illegal Mexicans full citizenship to the United States. I cannot find any similar instance on the left.

Finally, being utterly broken by illegal immigration, did the AFL-CIO join the Democrats in endorsing illegal immigrants. This was only out of necessity, because the unions rely on the Democrats for jobs, and the democrats rely on the poor for votes. So, to lay the fault of multi-racism on the lap of the left is as cynical a move as it is absurd. It wasn’t the homes of the working class left that the Mexicans were cleaning! It wasn’t the children of the working class left that the Mexicans were babysitting! It wasn’t the factories of the working class left that the Mexicans were staffing! The right wing, in their slavish support for the rich capitalist have helped the rich absolutely destroy our nation!

That is not all. They support church power and rule by superstition, in a time when mankind has made the most incredible scientific discoveries and technological advancement. They stand in opposition to our lowering the populations of Africa by distributing contraception. They wish to de-fund the public schools, which are the only way to train the young of the working class. They would scrap federal scholarships for the young of the working class, keeping a higher education out of reach. They stand in firm opposition to any attempts at curbing the disastrous and potentially suicidal effects of global warming.

Our support of “nationalism”, even adopting it as our own moniker is constantly confused with petty ethnic massacres between Serbs, Bosnians and Croats, or Irish and English, and the number would increase tenfold if we continued to feed such mad rivalries which exist in many European nations. The world is a smaller place today. Our race could act in unison or we could begin a new cold war and arms race. We should be breathing an enormous sigh of relief that we were not all blown to hell as a result of the cold war. Now with Europe and the US both marginalizing Russia, and Europe’s desire for competition with the US, what kind of future will petty “nationalism” provide for us? Shall we force Russia into alliance with China and India? Shall Europe and the US begin cold war anew in place of Russia and the US? No, my brothers, “small government” and national fragmentation will not provide a happy future for our puny little race against the flood of the non-White world. We need powerful, White global government, which manages and protects our race for the common good.

I will not argue whether or not the behavior of the right are moral or immoral behaviors, only that they are utterly stupid behaviors. In the modern age, if we are to remain competitive, when education and intelligence are so much more necessary for a nation’s strength than ever before, we cannot afford to continue with an “every man for himself” attitude. The White race is like a rape victim lying prone and in utter bewilderment and shock as the capitalist, having laid waste to our nation, pulls up and takes his factories to the third world.

White man! We do not need “limited” government. In this age, we need a government to give a lifetime of technical education to every White child, and a top notch university education to all who display the ability, regardless of the economics of their birth. Consider the scum which you support in your filthy Republican party! There is now an historically vast gulf between the rich and poor. It is a dangerous gulf. Do you fight to support the very people who have consistently ravaged your land and betrayed you? Do not think that I advocate for the Democrats. They, as well as the Jewish led radical left, have a shameful history with regard to the “civil rights” movement and “feminism”. So, I advocate for neither side of the rotten status quo. I advocate revolution! Pull your time and money out of the political play pen and prepare yourselves to fight like men.

We have guillotined the nobility before in our history, and showed that it did not adversely affect our ability for creativity and national strength. The wealthy should consider their positions because it is not out of the question that we might not do it again!

Leader as Entertainer

August 31, 2011 8 comments

Mass Movement Leadership as Party Planning

It seems that up until now, there have been no leadership organizations within the racist movement. The movement has been broken into two categories, both being rather ineffectual on their own and disdain to cross paths.

The first type I will classify as the literary movement. This movement is largely a stay at home movement. They tend to be a bit older. They like to read interesting journals and perhaps if they work up a ton of motivation, they’ll attend and annual conference, which really amounts to an intelligent form of party.

They seem to have no real tangible objective. They like to read interesting articles. They may not like the direction that society is going, but it hasn’t occurred to them to formulate a plan to change it. As long as they get more self-reinforcing literature to read, they’re happy. The leaders of this movement are actually smart enough to know what’s going on. However, instead of organizing and pooling resources to enact change in the real world, they’ve decided to provide entertainment for their readership. So the leader is an entertainer, who just routinely meets deadlines and comes up with more interesting stories for their audience at whatever regular intervals they can keep up. The big conference, for the really ambitious, is quite a hoot as well. The theory, I guess, is that once everyone on the planet is a subscriber, things will just change without having to take any action. Of course that day will never come.

The second type of movement I’ll call the “action” movement. These folks tend to be young and energetic. The leadership are quite intelligent, although inexperienced and often ill-disciplined. Their followers are just plain lazy and stupid. They, at base, have the exact same function and strategy as the literary movement, it is just more low brow in its approach. Here’s the formula. The leaders throw parties for the lazy and stupid followers. As long as enough lazy and stupid people show up to drink beer, they figure they are successful. Just like with the literary types, it’s all a numbers game. The more idle spectators you can amass, the more successful are your efforts, obviously. Just try to have such meetings with no alcohol at the ready and see how many people show up! They’re constantly trying to increase the idle herd.

So, the entire movement becomes one giant string of publicity stunts. To seem relevant to the idlers, one must have more spectacles. So, they will march in the streets to attract a ton of media attention. Or they periodically waste a bunch of time and money handing out flyers or throwing them on people’s lawns who don’t give a shit about what they’re saying. The entire purpose of all of these practices is to generate media controversy, so they can tell the idlers that their weekly or monthly beer party is where it’s at. Again, no change for the race is actually occurring. These groups just ebb and flow. Leaders burn out, and then new ones come along. It’s all predicated on the fact that once everyone on the planet comes to your party, you can win an easy victory without having to really do anything to change things.

What if people never show up, or the subscribers never come? Then what?

To plan a movement like that is to plan your financial future based on when you win the lotto.

One should have a plan for victory that includes nothing and no one more than we have already at our disposal. We already have hundreds of thousands of activists in the US today. We don’t need to recruit anymore. We simply need to organize them and put them to work, and not many of them either. Most of them won’t ever contribute any work.

Money is power. Leaders need to drop their high profile and their idle followers. They need to network only with leaders of other organizations, for it is that leadership class who is doing all of the work anyway! They need to make money and pool money. Once you have the finances, you can achieve anything. We need to buy land. We need to move White people to that land. We need to drive non-Whites away from that land. It all takes money, and that’s all it really takes. $10 in dues or subscription fees will never get you there.

List of Pro-White Organizations

August 30, 2011 13 comments

List of pro-White Organizations

This list is absurdly small only because it is extremely time consuming to find them all through web searches.  This is only a drop in the bucket.  These groups need to be found and networked.  Our numbers are far greater than you think.

We cannot win if we do not know who our friends are. We need to know what resources we have available. We need to network and assist one another. Community starts by knowing your neighbors.