Home > Education > The Demonstrable Dumbing Down of the West

The Demonstrable Dumbing Down of the West

One thing that has been noticeably universal in my educational career is how low the bar is set. Standards have been degraded to such depths that mediocrity is the norm. During high school, I went from being a studious, attentive student to just not giving a flying fuck. About anything. Around the time I started secondary school, the educational authorities had introduced a new system: the NCEA (National Certificate of Educational Achievement) system replaced the old School Certificate system, which was a more competitive system dependent on students at least getting a C. This was contrasted by the NCEA system, which was contingent on unit standards and an overall score or credits for the year to gain achievement. There were four basic marks you could gain in an internal assessment or external assessment (exam); non-Achievement, Achievement, Merit, and Excellence. For some internal assessments it was just Achievement and Non-achievement.

The real motivation of this system was to make it so easy to pass that even the most apathetic and cognitively-deficient students could get an Achieved (which was equivalent to about 35-40% overall, I found). But the effect it had was that of hollowing out the challenge and will to work hard for your marks in a class. Also, the gap between a Merit and an Excellence is so immense that was barely worth the disproportionate effort for the majority of gifted students to even bother pursuing it; a high Merit is worth the same as a low Merit on paper.

And it’s the same story with tertiary level education. The emphasis for education since the turn of the century has been on getting as many “bums on seats” as possible; not on educational quality. This has somewhat ironically been accompanied with a steady hike in non-learning expenses; administration costs, subsidising trips, and student services. And we’ve seen the function of university education change along side this policy: The major bulk of people are not gaining anything from their university experience apart from a piece of paper and mountains of debt (and maybe just the latter). Indeed, an American study of 24 universities found that 45% of students were not finding any gains in their writing, critical thinking or reasoning skills.

The past function of higher learning was to have those cognitive elites of a society pursue intellectual endeavors and put things into practice that they were capable of and deemed worthy; it was a privilege, not a right. It was largely the domain of the higher social strata of society, exclusive of people who could do less with this additional knowledge and scholarly pursuit.

But times have changed. This has been the net result of a concerted effort to marginalise men and encourage a feminisation of the learning environment, especially where White males are concerned. Every historically disenfranchised group must now be treated “equally” and subject to undue attention and adoration, except the so often chronicled oppressors (White males) who are already too equal and must be de-“privileged” and de-balled to accommodate a  leveling of the playing field- to their direct detriment. This leveling of the educational playing field has also paralleled another trend: The elimination of competition in school academics. A more “fair” and “equalised” school curriculum structure ensures that girls are outperforming boys in all areas in primary education, based primarily on the presumption that any inconsistency in achievement is based on environment and culture, and not on genetics or biological differences. This issue is catalysed by a forceful, society-wide integration policy that education is not exempt from. Undeniably, different races perform differently at different types of educational environments and have separate learning cultures (or lack there of), and the same is true for the sexes. But nobody tell the government that.

Given the leftist domination of academia at the highest level in the West, it should no surprise that a vast number of Western universities wallow in the shallow puddle of political rhetoric and agenda-driven narratives in stark opposition to real data, critical thinking and the hard sciences. Instead of being run by intellectuals and genuine truth-seekers, these institutes are run by anti-reality ideologues. Who else would encourage delusional feminist bovines to stampede wildly on campus? Left-leaning politics is is an undeniable aspect of the world of “higher” education, further consolidating the real non-value of most liberal arts degrees, and a proliferation of anti-White racial preferences in university intake, or Affirmative Action.

All of this lowest common denomification has taken its hazardous toll on the West. The Flynn Effect, or the ability of average IQ scores to continually rise from non-biological means has stopped. But I suspect it has less to do with us reaching our cognitive limits, and more to do with meticulously masochistic immigrant policies and egalitised education policies. Illustrating this point further, a Danish psychologist by the name of Helmuth Nyborg has found that the IQ of Denmark will fall dramatically in the latter half of the century as third world immigrants begin to dysgenically dominate the country.

But there are upsides to this modern era if you’re educationally-inclined. The major perk for the knowledge-seeker is the ease with which technology has allowed the acquisition of information. Now, anyone with a PC and an internet access has unprecedented levels of knowledge at their fingertips. Anyone with the desire to can view Yale courses online or find the most complex subjects broken down into a manner suitable for all styles of learning on Google. Presently, I’ve taken the initiative to relearn all the mathematics I shuffled through during high school- and proceeding beyond that level to gain as much knowledge as humanly possible.

As the assembly line of mainstream universities continue to break down and produce increasingly unsatisfactory products emphasising quantity over quality, more and more employers will disregard that meager bachelor and resort to other, more suitable means of discerning employee suitability. And only once that inflated educational bubble pops, will the real value of education be once again realised; That not everyone can or should be encouraged into higher learning, that doing so reduces the real worth of education, that people learn best when they are segregated on common attributes, and not herded into the same communal gangbang called the modern classroom.

  1. Ryu
    July 18, 2011 at 11:01 pm

    I firmly believe that it is up to the student to get the education that he wants. We’ve always had libraries, it’s just much easier to access these days. Most people are average, it is a fact. Everybody wants the A, but not everybody wants to do the work.

    If a student is truly serious in college, there is no room for work or drinking or anything else. To truly master a subject is very, very hard.

    In a way, these changes should be welcomed. It is exactly what the leftist want. Someone who really wants an education can get very far ahead if he wishes. As bad as our schools may be, the Chinaman and the Japanese compete to study with us. I have seen their best and I think that a studious Westerner could beat them.

    It’s a good test really. Let those who say they want an education be satisfied with what they get. Those who know better will have to go beyond school and become their own teachers.

  2. July 19, 2011 at 3:03 am

    Left-wing societal engineering is anti-life. These people are cowards whose fear of having to compete in the real world inspires their hate filled ideology. Ivory tower academics being the biggest lily livers of them all.

    Ryu is right, much better to open a book on your own volition if you truly want to learn. But where to start? For general histories I recommend Australian historian Geoffrey Blainey’s Short History of the World (any edition). For a more recent broad overview I’d suggest Niall Ferguson’s History of the British Empire.

    Anyone know any good books on American history?

  3. July 19, 2011 at 3:30 am

    i’ve encountered a lot of this in my univ education. i just graduated in may with a ba in history. most classes had mediocre students. I know i’ve always ranked really high in my classes, but because of the differences between “merit and exellance,” even though they didn’t use that system, it encouraged entropy, I know it’s my own damn fault, but i know if i would have been pushed harder, or the enviro was more competitive, i would have done better. i still did great, i got about a 3.5 gpa in univ, but i was consciously aware of the bullshit i put out sometimes, knowing it would still get me a passing grade and thus was contented with doing less work. I’m no jeff spicoli, but i wish college had more mr. hands.

    @ cameron lowen’s lies my teacher told me, founding brothers by joseph ellis and people’s history by howard zinn. zinn’s is a good read, even if you disagree with him

  4. Lucifer
    July 19, 2011 at 9:12 am

    Stunning article! You’ve won me over to this blog.

    I believe that Universities are no longer useful for hiring purposes. I personally would not hire a liberal arts college grad, because I know that they are dishonest.

    Universities train people to write papers on books they haven’t read using other books they’ve not read as references. They have also been trained as sycophants. They learn to lie to professors in order to get a good grade.

    The vast amount of scandal in modern business should be no surprise since plagiarism, and dissembling are requirements for entry.

    Honest people are simply weeded out of the system, or drop out when they see that they cannot honestly read 50 books in ten weeks.

    A friend of mine dropped out of college and became a carpenter. He taught himself computer programming and got a good job as a programmer. Now he is in a management position and will not hire college grads because he does not consider them to be men of integrity or self starters.

    I only have one disagreement with you. I believe that education should be available to all free of charge, especially if it is required for employment. Classes reflect privilege, not talent as George W Bush, the Yale graduate, so aptly demonstrates.

    • July 19, 2011 at 11:57 am

      Oh, that was not me being normative in what access people should have in regards to education; It was a description of how it used to be.

      I do think that restriction of information based on class won’t work given the ease at which we can access it, and is honestly undesirable in general. The more information an intelligent individual has, the easier it is for him to advance up the ladder of life and society.

  5. July 19, 2011 at 10:16 am

    “Universities train people to write papers on books they haven’t read using other books they’ve not read as references. They have also been trained as sycophants. They learn to lie to professors in order to get a good grade.”

    ahh so true. comprehensive understanding of the classics at univ are gone

  6. Pat
    July 19, 2011 at 10:27 am

    Quite agree. The majority of students do not have the ability to go on to years 11 and 12 let alone uni.

    But with the decline in manufacturing and other industries the demands for apprenticeships has declined. In my dad’s day students would regularly leave in year 9 for an apprenticeship or a junior level job. And that job you could stay with for life. You could rise through the ranks and the management themselves were drawn from experienced people within their own industry.

    Today it would be a rare thing for someone to rise through the levels of a multinational or medium to large enterprise business. I think the last two CEOs for MacDonalds (both Ozzies) have risen through the ranks but these are rarities. Large and medium enterprise is all about credentialism, affirmative action, and in-group promotion.

    Unions have failed the working man. They won’t even work on behalf of their members in the power generation industry against a carbon tax. Their efforts on behalf of apprenticeships and trainee’s are even more paltry and tokenistic.

    School has become a holding ground for the unemployable. I yearly read the honour roll of HSC results in my local paper and note the massively disproportionate amount of young women gaining high marks. Yet looking at their units of study the bulk are in soft arts type subjects. The young men take the traditional harder units like maths, physics etc.

    History study, one of the most culturally important in my opinion is politicised and manipulative. It is the equivalent of a marxist history of repression and revolution rather than an understanding of how our civilisation was created.

    But – the wealthier people still get a valuable education and entry into the stratosphere of high remuneration occupations. It is a class war waged by affluent SWPLs utilising race and culture against their less well off marginalised class and race.

    • Pat
      July 19, 2011 at 10:51 am

      One further thing I have discussed with Cam, is the constant refrain about a “skills shortage” in Oz. The mining sector in particular claims to have a skills shortage which, what with the current boom, has led to high wages in the order of even a truck driver getting 100K annually.

      Yet I have yet to see a comprehensive list of these skills that we are short of. The IT sector as well constantly rants about skills shortage so – what are these skills?

      I know techs in WA where the boom is at its most and they tell me that these so called high paying jobs are a lock out. They go to people with connections and are not related to a shortage of any kind.

      It seems to me that if our govt, left or right, were really so concerned about “working families”, “Australian values” etc they would detail a national employment and industry strategy indicating all those areas of occupation that will be in demand or are in demand that we are falling behind on. That this list is not easily accessible nor a simple policy enunciated in that regard tells me the thing is a scam and lock out.

      I’d like to see the employment numbers and skills required list for the NBN for instance. Since this is the largest fed govt scheme since the Hydro scheme one would have expected it to be relayed to the public already. But it hasn’t and what is happening is contracts going to mates underpinned by sub-contractors carrying the debt and infrastructure to actually deliver the NBN.

  7. Pat
    July 19, 2011 at 10:37 am

    One thing I would like a quick answer to if anyone knows, especially the Yanks on this blog, were freed slaves granted land in the USA?

  8. Ryu
    July 19, 2011 at 11:09 am

    Well, we had something called the Homestead Act, where you could collect 160 acres west of the Mississippi River, provided you fill out an application and build a house on the land. Slaves were eligible.

    There was the “40 acres and a mule” in 1865, when blacks were given just that. It was brief but eventually revoked.

    That “skills shortage” is used here as well. What it really means is that wages are too high, and we need to import immigrants who will work for less. It’s not a skills shortage, but a shortage of employers who will pay the market rate.

  9. July 19, 2011 at 12:13 pm

    Quite agree. The majority of students do not have the ability to go on to years 11 and 12 let alone uni. Unfortunately, this is very true.

    When big business has a firm hand in your immigration policy, you seem to get a situation where there are constant labour shortages; We must grow as a nation to grow economically! In reality, these supposed labour shortages are either inventions or subject to the unstable nature of the economic cycle. In reality, anyone with a slight knowledge of economics knows that the more people you have vying for the same positions, the less valued that labour becomes. The labour market becomes a buyer’s market.

    Some of the most idiotic, common sense-deficient people I have ever met have been in my studies. These people are the VERY cream of the crop when it comes to cabbage-ness. I remember a girl I was texting with, a little while back. She was telling me “its fukn hard” in reference to the difficulty she had encountered in regards to completing her assignment. I being a cheeky bastard respond with: “That’s what she said.” Her response? “wut who sed”.

    Yes, truly a smart, empowered young women. You go grrlfrand.

  10. Lucifer
    July 19, 2011 at 5:03 pm

    Pat, your first post was excellent.

    As Ryu correctly points out “skills shortage” is sort of like “weapons of mass destruction”. It’s a slogan used to soften the public to get them ready to accept big changes. Some of my management friends have lost programming jobs during this “skills shortage” and was replaced by far less skilled Indian immigrants for 1\3 the salary. In the US, the mantra of “skills shortage” was used to get the public to look the other way as they passed the H1B Visa to import Indian programmers. Bill Gates had a large role in that. He even set up programming schools in the third world to provide Microsoft with a steady stream of cheap labor.

  11. Lucifer
    July 19, 2011 at 5:26 pm

    Pat,

    Although I know of no such government resource, the way I find these jobs is by doing a google search for “What are the highest paying jobs?” And you will find listings of the average annual salaries of the different professions.

    I began teaching my son biology when I found out that spinal surgeons in the US earn an average annual salary of $1.5 million US.

  12. Mahoney (the key board warrior)
    July 20, 2011 at 12:47 am

    Love the new background. Say what you want about Mr Penn, Spicoli will live on for all time!

  13. Firepower
    July 20, 2011 at 1:43 am

    “Dysgenic” is a superbly fit, applicable world describing America.

    Unlike houseflies and rats, a country is forbidden to rid itself of human pests; the underlying dynamic is what becomes of these pests when they mature and propogate even greater dysgenic monstrosities.

    Answer: California

  1. August 1, 2011 at 11:10 am

Leave a comment